Idag släpps Människor och AI - En bok om artificiell intelligens i handeln. Bokreleasen uppmärksammas med ett livesänt seminarium med bl a Daniel Akenine, Stefan Larsson och Helena Nyholm. Läs mitt bidrag "Åtta biljoner anledningar för jurister att intressera sig för AI" här. 

Enskilda har rätt till information om hur persondata behandlas. Men hur ska företag som Google kunna förklara hur deras AI fungerar så att användare förstår när utvecklarna knappt gör det själva?

Nittonåriga Joshua Browders Donotpay kallas sig, i likhet med ROSS, "the world's first robot lawyer". Boten har använts för att överklaga ett stort antal parkeringsböter i Storbritannien, och har vidareutvecklats för att exempelvis kunna hantera exempelvis migrations- , hyres- och konsumenträttsliga ärenden. Browder, en av Forbes "30 under 30" i kategorin law and policy, berättar om hur han utvecklade verktyget i senaste avsnittet av Lawyerists podcast. 

Nu kan svenska bilister använda sig av en liknande tjänst. Avtal24:s Botboten skickar automatiskt ett överklagande till den part som utfärdat en bot efter att användaren svarat på ett par frågor och fyllt i registreringsnummer och andra detaljer. Användaren kan också bifoga bildbevis och ange om det finns vittnen till den aktuella händelsen. 


Fredrik Svärd
[email protected]

Läs också

Kan robotar ersätta jurister?
Tonåring lanserar robotjurist

Fråga

Varför döptes inte tjänsten till Parkeringsboten?

Professor Daniel Katz thinks the best is still yet to come. In his keynote at Lexpo last week, he outlined what the democratization of machine learning will mean for legal businesses.

Fredrik Svärd (Legaltech.se) och Richard Tromans (ArtificialLawyer.com) om den senaste utvecklingen på AI-området och om förväntningarna inför Lexpo i Amsterdam. 

Enligt ett tyskt lagförslag ska förare inte behöva hålla uppsikt över trafiken när fordon körs i självkörande läge. Helt självkörande bilar - men inte förarlösa - ska tillåtas på allmän väg. 

Tidningen Advokaten uppmärksammar i senaste numret att även svenska affärsbyråer nu börjat utvärdera AI-lösningar. Om några år kommer AI vara lika självklart som laptopen, tror Mannheimers MP Jan Dernestam.

Dernestam berättar för ​ Advokaten att MSA utvärderar leverantörerna Luminance och Kira Systems. Senast nästa år ska AI vara ett "självklart redskap".

- Jag ser AI som en ren möjlighet och ett fantastiskt verktyg. Fördelen med tekniken är att det kommer att vara våra klienter till godo, för det möjliggör för oss att arbeta ännu effektivare än vad vi gör i dag. Det kan på marginalen ersätta människor. Vi har redan övergivit bulkjuridiken.

Dernestam tillägger att han inte känner sig hotad av tekniken:

– Jag tror inte ett dugg på Richard Susskinds påstående om att det är slutet för advokaterna. Jag ser AI som en ren möjlighet och ett fantastiskt verktyg.

Vinge tittar också på tänkbara verktyg:

Erfarenheten hittills, exempelvis från Norge, är att steget från pilot till skarp användning mot klient är ganska stort. Själva är vi på teststadiet, och tittar på AI-lösningar för vissa specifika delar av vår tjänst, säger Maria-Pia Hope till Advokaten.

Onsdagen den 22 februari håller AI-utvecklaren RAVN ett gratis webbseminarium om hur advokatbyråer kan använda AI för att granska avtal. Läs mer här. 

Läs också

Så tänker Hannes Snellmans MP kring teknikutvecklingen
Juristbranschen nästa för IBM:s Watson 
AI stora samtalsämnet vid årets LegalWeek 
Kan teknikutvecklingen leda till ökad efterfrågan på jurister? 

I Sverige är digitala domstolar synonymt med domstolar som finns på sociala medier. Utomlands har man kommit längre - USA och Kina satsar på AI, i Norge är domstolarna på väg att bli papperslösa och i Nederländerna finns tjänster för att skilja sig online. Jag pratar med Peter Wright vid DigitallawUK om Storbritanniens planer på att hantera enklare mål helt digitalt och om möjligheten att låta tilltalade erkänna brott på nätet. Vi pratar också om virtual reality och om dataöverföringar till USA under Trump.
​

​​Europaparlamentets utskott för rättsliga frågor föreslår ett gemensamt regelverk för självkörande bilar och andra robotar. I den rapport som presenterades på torsdagen väcks också nytt liv i tanken på att erkänna robotar som elektroniska personer.

Landvinningarna inom maskininlärning behöver inte nödvändigtvis vara ett hot. Ekonomer tror att efterfrågan på mänskligt omdöme och beslutsfattande kommer öka i takt med att kostnaderna för att analysera data sjunker.

​Forskare har utvecklat ett verktyg som kan hjälpa Europadomstolen att prioritera bland inkommande ärenden. Självlärande algoritmer kan göra domstolar mer effektiva - men de kan också diskriminera.

Peter Danowsky (Danowsky & Partners), Paula Röttorp (Hannes Snellman) och Rachel Manser (Linklaters) om hur teknikutvecklingen påverkar advokatbranschen.
​

​There's a lot of buzz and hype surrounding "robot lawyers". This fall, Legaltech.se will discuss the possibilities and limitations of artificial intelligence with some of the industry leaders. Last month, Richard Tromans wrote about Neota Logic's smart advisors. Today we talk to Riverview Law's CEO Karl Chapman, keynote speaker at LegalWorks upcoming legal tech day in Stockholm. 

Riverview Law is, along with companies such as ROSS, Neota Logic, Kira Systems and RAVN one of the more talked-about developers of virtual assistants, data analytics tools and contract management solutions for in house legal and law firms. Serial entrepreneur Karl Chapman joined the company in 2011. 

Last year you wrote an interesting post about being an intruder or outsider in the legal vertical and about the barriers surrounding law. What’s the attitude towards change and technology among lawyers?

 
- Change can be difficult for everyone...  but it is particularly difficult in a market where there has been limited competition - which has resulted in some complacency and excess profits - and a largely ‘traditional’ education and training regime. It is one of the reasons why all our implementations for new customers, whether technology of managed services, focuses as much on people and behaviours as it does on the solution being delivered, says Chapman. 
​
Can you tell our readers what it is you do at Riverview Law – what’s the elevator pitch? 

 
- We help in-house legal teams to stop being fire brigades. We help them to be smart, not just busy. We do this by either providing fixed price, outsourced managed services which free the in-house team to focus on the key tactical and strategic work and/or licensing our technology so that they can do it themselves. We provide them with business insight through comprehensive reporting which enables them to ensure that the right work is done by the right people in the right place at the right price.

Professor Mitch Kowalski (author of Avoiding extinction: Reimagining legal services for the 21st century) is on your team. How’d that come about?


- We’ve known Mitch since we launched Riverview Law 4,5 years ago. He’s not a formal adviser but he is a key confidant. We read his book and were struck by how he had, without knowing us, described many elements of the Riverview Law business model. So, we just rang him!

On this topic – what kind of backgrounds do your employees have? Is legal tech a viable career path for young lawyers today?
 
- Our team come from a wide range of professional backgrounds – accounting, technology, project management, account management analytics, legal… Our legal personnel, all of whom we employ, range from individuals who join us as apprentices all the way through to ex General Counsel of large businesses. Many new roles will open for lawyers in the future given that the combination of tech and legal domain expertise will be one of the winning market formulae.

ROSS Intelligence, a "robot lawyer" based on IBM's Watson platform recently announced several new collaborations with law firms. Freshfields have announced a partnership with Kira Systems. Linklaters and Berwin Leighton Paisner have signed a deals with AI provider RAVN Systems, and Hodge, Jones & Allen has developed software for analyzing personal injury cases. It seems AI is gaining some traction.
 
- It depends on two things; how you define AI and how you distinguish between great PR and actual products, says Chapman. 

- There is no doubt that there is a growing discussion and to some extent understanding as to how technology generally can impact professional services. The big four accounting firms have been aware of this for some time given the way in which their audit, tax and other functions have been impacted by automation. The legal market is starting to catch up but we are still in the foothills – which is why there are such big opportunities.
 
What are the most common misconceptions?
 
- Like all technology the key is to not to be taken in and be excited by the hype, but to ask - what problem are we trying to solve?

- Having answered this question it’s possible to have a sensible conversation about the role that tech generally and AI specifically can play in the solution. We advise people to get the foundations right first – data layer, workflow and processes, reporting requirements … before trying AI solutions. There is a danger that jumping straight to AI can be like building a roof having not put the foundations, walls and joists in first. Getting the foundations right ensures that a function is AI enabled.
 
Earlier this year, IBM told me Go is too open and complex for computers. Just weeks later, AlphaGo famously beat Go champion Lee Sedol. It seems we constantly have to revise our expectations?

 
- A lot of the technology emerging appears as if it is an overnight sensation… but it’s not, it’s been in development for decades! There is no doubt that we are living through an exciting and transformational period which will impact all business models over the next 10 to 15 years.

What are the main limiting factors regarding innovation in the legal sector? Regulation? Culture? Awareness? 
 
- There is no one answer to this. It is so situational. Interestingly, the trend we’re seeing is that the in-house legal team is under such pressure to deliver more with less that it has the burning platform. As a result it is considering and adopting change at a much quicker pace than most of the supply chain (law firms). This will inevitably drive change throughout the profession over the next 5 years.

There’s been some controversy surrounding the American Bar Association’s future of legal services report, mainly regarding vagueness and the lack of involvement of tech people. Is collaboration between lawyers and IT professionals important?
 
- Collaboration across all functions is important. However, in a world of configuration - not coding - it is not necessary for lawyers to become coders. The emerging tech and AI will increasingly allow professionals, with competent Microsoft Office level skills, to embed their domain expertise in solutions. This is a game changer. 

Some law schools have started teaching IT skills to prepare students for "the new normal"... 
 
- Understanding data, reporting and metrics will become an absolute necessity. Lawyers who cannot tell their customers the story told by the data around their legal requirements and cases will find the world moving increasingly away from them.

Sweden is a small country with a small language. How do you see the Nordic market? 

 
- One of the great things about the world we’re in is that we can all build global businesses, using tech, from our bedrooms. We are only limited by our imagination, courage and stamina. What fun!
 
How do civil law jurisdicitions differ from common law ones, from a legal tech perspective? 

 
- In our experience not at all!
​

​
Legaltech.se will reveal the winners of the inaugural swedish legal innovation awards at LegalWorks inhouse legal tech day 2016. You're scheduled to give a keynote speech, what issues will you adress?

 
- The key theme is that in the world emerging customers are the big winners. Whether they are consumers, small businesses or large corporations tomorrow customers, using a range of virtual assistants and tech tools, will be able to do a lot of what is today delivered by the supply chain. We are at the start of disintermediation in the legal market, says Chapman. 
 
The event is aimed at counsels at legal departments. How can they use virtual assistants and similar tools today? 
 
- General Counsel and in-house leaders either use our managed service solutions to free their team to move further up the value curve - i.e. to focus on key tactical and strategic matters - and license our technology to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their own function. One of the key strengths of Kim, our technology subsidiary, is that it is easy to use and configure plus it delivers comprehensive management information and reporting. It allows GCs and in-house teams to make better and quicker decisions.


Related: 

AI - hope or hype? Debate between Karl Chapman and Richard Susskind
Neota Logic's "smart advisors"
Ashurst: There will still be significant demand for the skills of lawyers
Effacts founder on developing solutions for smaller markets
Lawyer-turned entrepreneur aims to make lawyers mobile 

Fredrik Svärd
[email protected] ​

Paneldebatten om AI med bl a professor Richard Susskind och Riverviews vd Karl Chapman var en av höjdpunkterna när årets British Legal Technology Forum gick av stapeln. Lyssna på debatten här. 
​

Ashurst has announced the launch of a global team – Ashurst Advance – with a mission to make the firm more efficient and better at adopting new technologies. - Clearly clients are focused on driving efficiency in their legal engagement. Technology is one integral solution to that, as well as providing transparency and reducing risk, says director Mark Higgs.

​Deloitte har använt Kira Systems maskininlärningsteknik för dokumentgranskning internt i drygt ett år. Företagen samarbetar nu för att ta fram liknande lösningar åt andra företag.  
​